Hence the main translations I see scholars use today are the NASB, ESV, and NKJV, all of which use formal equivalence. For serious students of scripture wanting accurate exposition of the original material (exegesis), dynamic equivalence presents too many unnecessary obstacles. For the casual reader, simply wanting to acquaint themselves with the general gist of biblical narratives, this may be quite unimportant. Whilst this makes for a simpler read, it’s often at the expense of the precise meaning of the original text. Popular Bibles like the New International Version (NIV) mainly employ dynamic equivalence as their translation method. Reproduces the text using modern language and expression to communicate the basic message of each verse. This method emphasizes lexical and structural authenticity, which can be essential to comprehending meaning and doctrine. Preserves the literal fidelity of the original text whilst maintaining good literary form. There are two main scriptural translation philosophies:. Generally, modern Bible translations are produced by a committee of scholars, clergy, and teachers who assemble over long periods to decide how to represent the original texts. Balance of modern scholarship utilizing many recent scriptural discoveries, updated language, corrections to their original Revised Standard Version (RSV) source, and improved readability. Balance of modern scholarship, updated language, and preservation of the literary cadences of the King James Version (original 1611). Best balance of original text literality, modern scholarship, updated language, and readability.

New American Standard Bible (NASB), 1995 text.

I recommended the following translations:.

Getting the right version(s) is important for serious scriptural study – part and parcel of a thorough education in spiritual wisdom, history, culture, cosmology, prophecy, and eschatology.

There are over a hundred different translations of the Bible.

Nasb audio bible with text displayed